From: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: 8.0.X and the ARC patent |
Date: | 2005-02-25 06:47:39 |
Message-ID: | 20050225024702.X75321@ganymede.hub.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, 25 Feb 2005, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Simon Riggs wrote:
>> On Mon, 2005-02-14 at 18:17 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>>> For development, this means we will _not_ have a shortened, non-initdb
>>> 8.1 release but a regular release cycle with the typical big batch of
>>> features.
>>
>> Might we set a rough date for Beta freeze for 8.1 then?
>>
>> September 30th 2005 ?
>>
>> I see only benefit from publishing a not-before date now. It's up to
>> Core if it slips, but it'll really help with gaining funding if people
>> can accurately determine whether or not features can be added for
>> inclusion in the next release. There are lots of potential donors
>> waiting, so lets give them some certainty about which release their
>> payback will occur in....
>
> Yea, probably September, but you can't dump a huge feature on us in
> August either without having talked about it first, so knowing the date
> might not be that helpful.
I thought we were looking at a 12-18 month cycle for 8.1? Which would put
beta around January '06, no?
----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Neil Conway | 2005-02-25 06:48:16 | Re: Where are we on stored procedures? |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2005-02-25 06:31:00 | Re: Finding if old transactions are running... |