Re: pg_basebackup vs. Windows and tablespaces

From: Dilip kumar <dilip(dot)kumar(at)huawei(dot)com>
To: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_basebackup vs. Windows and tablespaces
Date: 2014-09-12 08:20:53
Message-ID: 4205E661176A124FAF891E0A6BA9135266351C2E@szxeml509-mbs.china.huawei.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 11 September 2014 10:21, Amit kapila Wrote,

>I don't think currently such a limitation is mentioned in docs,
>however I think we can update the docs at below locations:

>1. In description of pg_start_backup in below page:
>http://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/static/functions-admin.html#FUNCTIONS-ADMIN-BACKUP
>2. In Explanation of Base Backup, basically under heading
>Making a Base Backup Using the Low Level API at below
>page:
>http://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/static/continuous-archiving.html#BACKUP-BASE-BACKUP

>In general, we can explain about symlink_label file where ever
>we are explaining about backup_label file.

>If you think it is sufficient to explain about symlink_label in
>above places, then I can update the patch.

I think this will be sufficient….

Regards,
Dilip

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Etsuro Fujita 2014-09-12 08:20:58 Re: Optimization for updating foreign tables in Postgres FDW
Previous Message Heikki Linnakangas 2014-09-12 07:55:43 Re: Incorrect initialization of sentPtr in walsender.c