Re: pg_upgrade --jobs

From: Ron <ronljohnsonjr(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pg_upgrade --jobs
Date: 2019-04-06 23:57:31
Message-ID: 41c4d2a3-0a0a-bec3-7609-ec232b95f27b@gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On 4/6/19 6:50 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> senor <frio_cervesa(at)hotmail(dot)com> writes:
[snip]
>> The --link option to pg_upgrade would be so much more useful if it
>> weren't still bound to serially dumping the schemas of half a million
>> tables.
> To be perfectly blunt, if you've got a database with half a million
> tables, You're Doing It Wrong.

Heavy (*really heavy*) partitioning?

--
Angular momentum makes the world go 'round.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message senor 2019-04-07 00:47:59 Re: pg_upgrade --jobs
Previous Message Tom Lane 2019-04-06 23:50:58 Re: pg_upgrade --jobs