| From: | Emily Boyd <emily(at)tinysofa(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Mitch Pirtle <mitch(dot)pirtle(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Ned Lilly <ned(at)nedscape(dot)com>, "Gavin M(dot) Roy" <gmr(at)ehpg(dot)net>, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org, emily(at)tinysofa(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] PostgreSQL.org Design Proposal |
| Date: | 2004-10-27 18:22:02 |
| Message-ID: | 417FE74A.80308@tinysofa.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-www |
Mitch Pirtle wrote:
> Tom, that layout is a PNG graphic, of course it doesn't scale ;-)
>
> But this design (done right, which I suspect Omar & Emily of doing)
> could easily collapse 200 pixels to drop to a minimum 800 pixels wide.
> To me this is a non issue.
Before this turns into a debate on a technicality such as how much space
Tom lets me have on his screen... :)
Just wanted to note that this is a fixed size design proposal, and it
will scale gracefully to 800 x 600 upon HTMLification.
> And if you've got a big monitor, then use it! Why pretend to surf on
> a Palm Pilot?
>
> -- Mitch
(I was going to mention that it was a PNG... but Mitch beat me to it... :)
Regards,
Emily Boyd
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2004-10-27 18:23:25 | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] PostgreSQL.org Design Proposal |
| Previous Message | Mitch Pirtle | 2004-10-27 18:15:26 | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] PostgreSQL.org Design Proposal |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2004-10-27 18:23:25 | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] PostgreSQL.org Design Proposal |
| Previous Message | Mitch Pirtle | 2004-10-27 18:15:26 | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] PostgreSQL.org Design Proposal |