Re: VACUUM DELAY

From: Gaetano Mendola <mendola(at)bigfoot(dot)com>
To: Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com>
Subject: Re: VACUUM DELAY
Date: 2004-08-10 16:42:36
Message-ID: 4118FAFC.6000600@bigfoot.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Jan Wieck wrote:
> On 8/9/2004 7:41 PM, Gaetano Mendola wrote:
>
>> If I remember well this is the first command that need to change
>> GUC in order to change behaviour, I don't think we wrote:
>>
>> set vacuum_mode = full;
>> set vacuum_verbosity = on;
>> vacuum;
>
>
> You got a point here. However, we don't have
>
> SELECT foo FROM bar WHERE baz = 'bumm' NOSEQSCAN;
>
> either, and I hope you don't suggest doing that next :-)

Good idea indeed :-)

This could be the first step to give some hints to the planner,
Informix have it for sure and if I remember well Oracle have it,
Sybase have it...

Regards
Gaetano Mendola

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2004-08-10 17:01:42 Re: Add Missing From?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2004-08-10 16:42:20 Re: fsync vs open_sync (more info)