Re: VACUUM DELAY

From: Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com>
To: Gaetano Mendola <mendola(at)bigfoot(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: VACUUM DELAY
Date: 2004-08-10 03:09:30
Message-ID: 41183C6A.9060307@Yahoo.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 8/9/2004 7:41 PM, Gaetano Mendola wrote:

> If I remember well this is the first command that need to change
> GUC in order to change behaviour, I don't think we wrote:
>
> set vacuum_mode = full;
> set vacuum_verbosity = on;
> vacuum;

You got a point here. However, we don't have

SELECT foo FROM bar WHERE baz = 'bumm' NOSEQSCAN;

either, and I hope you don't suggest doing that next :-)

Jan

--
#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me. #
#================================================== JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com #

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2004-08-10 03:19:25 Re: PITR - Some data is not recovered.
Previous Message Doug McNaught 2004-08-10 03:05:31 Re: fsync vs open_sync