Re: Version Numbering -- The great debate

From: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Version Numbering -- The great debate
Date: 2004-08-01 04:20:59
Message-ID: 410C6FAB.2040202@familyhealth.com.au
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

>>This is more features worth mentioning than we've ever had in a single release
>>before -- and if you consider several add-ons which have been
>>implemented/improved at the same time (Slony, PL/Java, etc.) it's even more
>>momentous. If this isn't 8.0, then what will be?
>
>
> I tend to agree, and was about to bring up the point myself.

I'm in favour of 8.0. There's a time to be humble and a time for hard
work to be properly recognised.

Chris

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Zhenbang Wei 2004-08-01 04:21:42 Traditional Chinese psql-zh_TW.po for 7.5
Previous Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2004-08-01 04:19:08 Re: Version Numbering -- The great debate