Re: Version Numbering -- The great debate

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Version Numbering -- The great debate
Date: 2004-08-01 04:44:24
Message-ID: 200408010444.i714iOS21706@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
> >>This is more features worth mentioning than we've ever had in a single release
> >>before -- and if you consider several add-ons which have been
> >>implemented/improved at the same time (Slony, PL/Java, etc.) it's even more
> >>momentous. If this isn't 8.0, then what will be?
> >
> >
> > I tend to agree, and was about to bring up the point myself.
>
> I'm in favour of 8.0. There's a time to be humble and a time for hard
> work to be properly recognized.

FYI, the move to 7.0 was done after we realized that 6.5 should have
been numbered 7.0.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2004-08-01 04:48:21 initdb problem
Previous Message Zhenbang Wei 2004-08-01 04:21:42 Traditional Chinese psql-zh_TW.po for 7.5