| From: | Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
| Cc: | pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org, plperlng-devel(at)pgfoundry(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: latest plperl |
| Date: | 2004-07-01 16:33:57 |
| Message-ID: | 40E43CF5.7020309@joeconway.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-patches |
Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> I will do some checking on these changes, but with those caveats they look
> good to me.
Attached is an all inclusive revised patch. Please review and comment.
If there are no objections, I'll commit in a few hours.
As a side note, I think it would be *really* helpful if there were a
more comprehensive test script, and an expected results file available.
Not sure though if it could be included in the standard regression tests
on a configure-conditional basis -- anyone know?
Joe
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| plperl.01.patch | text/x-patch | 31.8 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joe Conway | 2004-07-01 16:41:38 | Re: [Plperlng-devel] Re: latest plperl |
| Previous Message | Joe Conway | 2004-07-01 16:06:56 | Re: latest plperl |