Re: latest plperl

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org, plperlng-devel(at)pgfoundry(dot)org
Subject: Re: latest plperl
Date: 2004-07-01 17:26:01
Message-ID: 28708.1088702761@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> writes:
> As a side note, I think it would be *really* helpful if there were a
> more comprehensive test script, and an expected results file available.
> Not sure though if it could be included in the standard regression tests
> on a configure-conditional basis -- anyone know?

pltcl has a separate regression test, which seems to serve the purpose
well enough. I'd suggest focusing more on getting the tests into
existence than on whether they have to be integrated ;-)

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Treat 2004-07-01 17:55:20 Re: possibly updating techdocs; mysql2pgsql on gborg
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2004-07-01 17:06:20 Re: latest plperl