Re: Bug in RENAME TO?

From: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Bug in RENAME TO?
Date: 2004-06-13 03:08:56
Message-ID: 40CBC548.5000701@familyhealth.com.au
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> d=# update pg_proc set proname = zsubstring(proname,2);
> UPDATE 1727
>
> So I say there isn't any reason to prohibit renaming functions just
> because they were created at initdb time. The worst-case scenario
> is you have to rename 'em back. Likewise for ALTER OWNER.

Again, no reason to stop them doing it via catalog hacking, but really
good reasons to stop them doing it via SQL commands....

Chris

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2004-06-13 03:12:48 Re: Big feature status
Previous Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2004-06-13 03:07:02 Re: Bug in RENAME TO?