Re: Online enabling of checksums

From: Andrey Borodin <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru>
To: Michael Banck <michael(dot)banck(at)credativ(dot)de>
Cc: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Online enabling of checksums
Date: 2018-03-18 16:21:26
Message-ID: 40B87FCF-357B-4A81-BC17-9FA11CCBECDC@yandex-team.ru
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi!

> 18 марта 2018 г., в 19:02, Michael Banck <michael(dot)banck(at)credativ(dot)de> написал(а):
>
> Otherwise, I had a quick look over v4 and found no further issues.
> Hopefully I will be able to test it on some bigger test databases next
> week.
>
> I'm switching the state back to 'Waiting on Author'; if you think the
> above points are moot, maybe switch it back to 'Needs Review' as Andrey
> Borodin also marked himself down as reviewer and might want to have
> another look as well.

Yep, i'm already doing another pass on the code again. Hope to finish tomorrow.
My 2 cents, there's typo in the word "connections"
+ <literal>template0</literal> is by default not accepting connetions, to

Best regards, Andrey Borodin.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Isaac Morland 2018-03-18 16:33:57 Re: Recently-introduced segfault in initdb?
Previous Message Michael Banck 2018-03-18 14:02:35 Re: Online enabling of checksums