| From: | Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, akapila(at)postgresql(dot)org, nisha(dot)moond412(at)gmail(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: REASSIGN OWNED vs. relisshared dep on !relisshared |
| Date: | 2026-07-15 18:36:56 |
| Message-ID: | 40935c681b3649e8e12cbde4fe86e24a619bc12c.camel@j-davis.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, 2026-07-15 at 20:53 +0530, Dilip Kumar wrote:
> Thanks for the review
Looks good to me, thank you for the patch. I will commit this soon.
To address Noah's concern: is the concern about the dependency link, or
about having a database-specific oid in a shared catalog at all?
If the former, then we could do the same work manually outside of the
pg_depend mechanism.
If the latter, we could decompose pg_subscription into the columns
necessary for the launcher (shared catalog) and the database-specific
columns (unshared catalog). But that's more invasive so it might not be
v19 material.
Thoughts?
Regards,
Jeff Davis
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | surya poondla | 2026-07-15 18:48:35 | Re: [DESIGN] Soft DROP TABLE, recoverable drops for PostgreSQL |
| Previous Message | Semih Doğan | 2026-07-15 18:30:24 | [PATCH] pgbench: fix incorrect long option name in error message |