Re: Sorting performance vs. MySQL

From: Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>
To: Yeb Havinga <yebhavinga(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com>, Yang Zhang <yanghatespam(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Sorting performance vs. MySQL
Date: 2010-02-23 10:17:01
Message-ID: 407d949e1002230217u43d55ccg9e07f0014532da44@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 9:48 AM, Yeb Havinga <yebhavinga(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Greg Stark wrote:
>>
>> You can do \set FETCH_COUNT to have psql use a cursor automatically.
>>
>
> It seems like a big win in this case. What would be the downside of having a
> fetch_count set default in psql?

They were mentioned previously in this thread:

1) If an error occurs partway through the execution of the query you
might receive part of the result set.

2) psql won't be able to align the columns properly

--
greg

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Stark 2010-02-23 10:21:18 Re: Implementing an Index Access Method in PG 8.4
Previous Message Carsten Kropf 2010-02-23 10:00:46 Implementing an Index Access Method in PG 8.4