| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Mark Hollomon" <mhh(at)nortelnetworks(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: functional index arg matching patch |
| Date: | 2000-08-22 03:45:09 |
| Message-ID: | 4049.966915909@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
"Mark Hollomon" <mhh(at)nortelnetworks(dot)com> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Um, thanks for working on this, but I already fixed that...
> When? A message you sent on 8-11 indicated it wasn't.
(Checks CVS) ... yesterday, actually.
> I'll be interested in seeing how you did it.
I just called the ambiguous-function-name-resolution code in
parse_func.c and then checked to make sure it hadn't selected
something the executor wasn't prepared to cope with --- ie,
functions requiring runtime conversions of input data types.
It looked like you had copied out a bunch of the parse_func.c code,
which is OK in the short run but the duplicated code might be
a headache to keep in sync later on.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2000-08-22 03:51:36 | Re: How Do You Pronounce "PostgreSQL"? |
| Previous Message | Mike Mascari | 2000-08-22 03:40:26 | Re: Bug tracking (was Re: +/- Inf for float8's) |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Mark Hollomon | 2000-08-22 12:43:03 | Re: functional index arg matching patch |
| Previous Message | Dario Basso Cardoso | 2000-08-21 16:29:22 |