| From: | Jochem van Dieten <jochemd(at)oli(dot)tudelft(dot)nl> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Slony-I makes progress |
| Date: | 2004-03-04 23:47:23 |
| Message-ID: | 4047C00B.5040703@oli.tudelft.nl |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgadmin-hackers pgsql-hackers |
Josh Berkus wrote:
>
> I personally don't think that a GUI tool should be the province of the Slony
> project. Seriously. I think that Slony should focus on a command-line api
> and catalogs, and allow the existing GUI projects to build a slony-supporting
> interface.
Why a command line api? I believe it would make sense to be able
to configure and control all nodes of the entire system from psql
connected to any of the nodes. That would also facilitate the
existing GUI projects in adding a Slony-manager.
Jochem
--
I don't get it
immigrants don't work
and steal our jobs
- Loesje
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Christopher Browne | 2004-03-05 03:18:36 | Re: Slony-I makes progress |
| Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2004-03-04 19:15:22 | Re: Slony-I makes progress |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Ronald Kuczek | 2004-03-04 23:50:51 | Re: [HACKERS] Another crack at doing a Win32 |
| Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2004-03-04 22:55:21 | Re: [HACKERS] Another crack at doing a Win32 build under MINGW |