Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: jade X openjade

From: Shridhar Daithankar <shridhar(at)frodo(dot)hserus(dot)net>
To: pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: jade X openjade
Date: 2004-02-21 08:13:10
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-docs
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> Halley Pacheco de Oliveira wrote:
>> In my Athon 1.7 512 MB RAM computer with Debian it
>> takes 2m6s to generate de PostgreSQL 7.4.1 HTML
>> documentation using JADE and 4m7s using OPENJADE
>> (almost 2X). So why use OPENJADE ?
> I would have to double check, but I think OPENJADE offers better backend 
> support.
> Personally I think the real question should be, Why *JADE*? We should be
> doing whatever it takes to move to XML/XSLT.
> Using Apache xerces I can transform a 1000 page document in less than a 
> minute.

I have used xercess-C++ in my current project and I can tell you one thing. It's 
object model is broken.

It is a fine API in general but the way it's object model is broken, makes me 
hate it.. really..

  Given a better choice I wouldn't use it. But I haven't used any other XML 
toolkits either. My XML experience is pretty limited..


In response to


pgsql-docs by date

Next:From: Joshua D. DrakeDate: 2004-02-21 20:42:12
Subject: Re: jade X openjade
Previous:From: Joshua D. DrakeDate: 2004-02-20 16:49:50
Subject: Re: jade X openjade

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group