From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Halley Pacheco de Oliveira <halleypo(at)yahoo(dot)com(dot)br> |
Cc: | pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: jade X openjade |
Date: | 2004-02-20 16:49:50 |
Message-ID: | 40363AAE.4010004@commandprompt.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-docs |
Halley Pacheco de Oliveira wrote:
> In my Athon 1.7 512 MB RAM computer with Debian it
> takes 2m6s to generate de PostgreSQL 7.4.1 HTML
> documentation using JADE and 4m7s using OPENJADE
> (almost 2X). So why use OPENJADE ?
I would have to double check, but I think OPENJADE offers better backend
support.
Personally I think the real question should be, Why *JADE*? We should be
doing whatever it takes to move to XML/XSLT.
Using Apache xerces I can transform a 1000 page document in less than a
minute.
J
>
> Halley
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
>
> Yahoo! Mail - O melhor e-mail do Brasil! Abra sua conta agora:
> http://br.yahoo.com/info/mail.html
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend
--
Command Prompt, Inc., home of Mammoth PostgreSQL - S/ODBC and S/JDBC
Postgresql support, programming shared hosting and dedicated hosting.
+1-503-667-4564 - jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com - http://www.commandprompt.com
Mammoth PostgreSQL Replicator. Integrated Replication for PostgreSQL
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
jd.vcf | text/x-vcard | 640 bytes |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Shridhar Daithankar | 2004-02-21 08:13:10 | Re: jade X openjade |
Previous Message | Halley Pacheco de Oliveira | 2004-02-20 15:16:09 | jade X openjade |