Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: jade X openjade

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Halley Pacheco de Oliveira <halleypo(at)yahoo(dot)com(dot)br>
Cc: pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: jade X openjade
Date: 2004-02-20 16:49:50
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-docs
Halley Pacheco de Oliveira wrote:
> In my Athon 1.7 512 MB RAM computer with Debian it
> takes 2m6s to generate de PostgreSQL 7.4.1 HTML
> documentation using JADE and 4m7s using OPENJADE
> (almost 2X). So why use OPENJADE ?

I would have to double check, but I think OPENJADE offers better backend 

Personally I think the real question should be, Why *JADE*? We should be
doing whatever it takes to move to XML/XSLT.

Using Apache xerces I can transform a 1000 page document in less than a 


> Halley
> ______________________________________________________________________
> Yahoo! Mail - O melhor e-mail do Brasil! Abra sua conta agora:
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend

Command Prompt, Inc., home of Mammoth PostgreSQL - S/ODBC and S/JDBC
Postgresql support, programming shared hosting and dedicated hosting.
+1-503-667-4564 - jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com -
Mammoth PostgreSQL Replicator. Integrated Replication for PostgreSQL

Attachment: jd.vcf
Description: text/x-vcard (640 bytes)

In response to


pgsql-docs by date

Next:From: Shridhar DaithankarDate: 2004-02-21 08:13:10
Subject: Re: jade X openjade
Previous:From: Halley Pacheco de OliveiraDate: 2004-02-20 15:16:09
Subject: jade X openjade

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group