Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] PITR Dead horse?

From: Mark Kirkwood <markir(at)paradise(dot)net(dot)nz>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com,"'Marc G(dot) Fournier'" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>,'Tatsuo Ishii' <t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp>, snaga(at)snaga(dot)org,austin(at)coremetrics(dot)com, pgsql-hackers-pitr(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] PITR Dead horse?
Date: 2004-02-12 23:16:41
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-hackers-pitr
Tom recently posted the PITR patch to PATCHES - maybe we should sent it 
to this list too. That might kick start the discussion...



Bruce Momjian wrote:

>No one has said anything on the list yet.  :-)

In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: markwDate: 2004-02-12 23:50:33
Subject: Re: Proposed Query Planner TODO items
Previous:From: Simon RiggsDate: 2004-02-12 22:56:00
Subject: Re: Transaction aborts on syntax error.

pgsql-hackers-pitr by date

Next:From: Simon RiggsDate: 2004-02-12 23:59:43
Subject: Proposals for PITR
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2004-02-12 20:18:42
Subject: Re: PITR Dead horse?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group