Re: Triage on old commitfest entries

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
Cc: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Triage on old commitfest entries
Date: 2021-10-05 02:45:12
Message-ID: 4026968.1633401912@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> writes:
> Entirely agree with this. Index skip scan is actually *ridiculously*
> useful in terms of an improvement, and we need to get the right people
> together to work on it and get it implemented. I'd love to see this
> done for v15, in particular. Who do we need to coordinate getting
> together to make it happen?

It sounds like Peter is willing to take point on the executor end
of things (b-tree in particular). If he can explain what a reasonable
cost model would look like, I'm willing to see about making that happen
in the planner.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephen Frost 2021-10-05 02:57:46 Role Self-Administration
Previous Message Stephen Frost 2021-10-05 02:29:17 Re: Triage on old commitfest entries