Re: [PERFORM] MySQL+InnoDB vs. PostgreSQL test?

From: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com, Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PERFORM] MySQL+InnoDB vs. PostgreSQL test?
Date: 2004-02-03 04:55:27
Message-ID: 401F29BF.7060705@familyhealth.com.au
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy pgsql-performance

>>Out of interest, what is it about this particular task that's so hard?
>
>
> Keeping track of multiple lockers in a fixed amount of disk space.

Why not look at how InnoDB does it? Or is that not applicable?

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2004-02-03 05:17:15 Re: MySQL+InnoDB vs. PostgreSQL test?
Previous Message Christopher Browne 2004-02-03 04:54:15 Re: MySQL+InnoDB vs. PostgreSQL test?

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2004-02-03 05:17:15 Re: MySQL+InnoDB vs. PostgreSQL test?
Previous Message Christopher Browne 2004-02-03 04:54:15 Re: MySQL+InnoDB vs. PostgreSQL test?