| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> |
| Cc: | josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com, Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [PERFORM] MySQL+InnoDB vs. PostgreSQL test? |
| Date: | 2004-02-03 04:43:57 |
| Message-ID: | 11553.1075783437@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-performance |
Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> writes:
>> No, but Chris is correct that we could do with having some kind of
>> shared lock facility at the row level.
> Out of interest, what is it about this particular task that's so hard?
Keeping track of multiple lockers in a fixed amount of disk space.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Christopher Browne | 2004-02-03 04:54:15 | Re: MySQL+InnoDB vs. PostgreSQL test? |
| Previous Message | Christopher Kings-Lynne | 2004-02-03 04:30:43 | Re: [PERFORM] MySQL+InnoDB vs. PostgreSQL test? |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Christopher Browne | 2004-02-03 04:54:15 | Re: MySQL+InnoDB vs. PostgreSQL test? |
| Previous Message | Christopher Kings-Lynne | 2004-02-03 04:30:43 | Re: [PERFORM] MySQL+InnoDB vs. PostgreSQL test? |