| From: | Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> |
|---|---|
| To: | Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com> |
| Cc: | josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: MySQL+InnoDB vs. PostgreSQL test? |
| Date: | 2004-02-03 03:04:45 |
| Message-ID: | 401F0FCD.70903@familyhealth.com.au |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-performance |
> Seriously, I am tired of this kind of question. You gotta get bold
> enough to stand up in a "meeting" like that, say "guy's, you can ask me
> how this compares to Oracle ... but if you're seriously asking me how
> this compares to MySQL, call me again when you've done your homework".
Hey at least I noticed that InnoDB has one essential feature we don't:
SELECT ... IN SHARE MODE;
Which does a shared lock on a row as opposed to a write lock, hence
avoiding nasty foreign key deadlocks...
Chris
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2004-02-03 03:41:57 | Re: MySQL+InnoDB vs. PostgreSQL test? |
| Previous Message | Adam Ruth | 2004-02-03 02:20:33 | Re: MySQL+InnoDB vs. PostgreSQL test? |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2004-02-03 03:41:57 | Re: MySQL+InnoDB vs. PostgreSQL test? |
| Previous Message | Adam Ruth | 2004-02-03 02:20:33 | Re: MySQL+InnoDB vs. PostgreSQL test? |