| From: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>, Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: MySQL+InnoDB vs. PostgreSQL test? |
| Date: | 2004-02-03 03:41:57 |
| Message-ID: | 200402021941.57516.josh@agliodbs.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-performance |
Chris,
> Hey at least I noticed that InnoDB has one essential feature we don't:
>
> SELECT ... IN SHARE MODE;
>
> Which does a shared lock on a row as opposed to a write lock, hence
> avoiding nasty foreign key deadlocks...
Um, wrong. We don't lock rows for SELECT.
--
-Josh Berkus
______AGLIO DATABASE SOLUTIONS___________________________
Josh Berkus
Complete information technology josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com
and data management solutions (415) 565-7293
for law firms, small businesses fax 621-2533
and non-profit organizations. San Francisco
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2004-02-03 03:49:49 | Only SEVEN DAYS Until OSCON Deadline! |
| Previous Message | Christopher Kings-Lynne | 2004-02-03 03:04:45 | Re: MySQL+InnoDB vs. PostgreSQL test? |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Kris Jurka | 2004-02-03 04:01:35 | Re: COPY from question |
| Previous Message | Christopher Kings-Lynne | 2004-02-03 03:04:45 | Re: MySQL+InnoDB vs. PostgreSQL test? |