| From: | "Chad R(dot) Larson" <clarson(at)eldocomp(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Rajesh Kumar Mallah(dot)" <mallah(at)trade-india(dot)com>, "Adam Erickson" <adamre(at)cox(dot)net>, <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: really important |
| Date: | 2002-06-20 20:18:07 |
| Message-ID: | 4.2.2.20020620131648.00a85320@ecint.ecinet.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-admin |
At 07:36 AM 6/19/02 , Rajesh Kumar Mallah. wrote:
>Why cant' pg_dump become a part OF disaster recovery?
>
>I agree replication is very important , but also appriciate
>that pgsql give us so many other useful features that are not
>in other open source databases
And, to revisit an earlier issue, we should have point-in-time recovery.
-crl
--
Chad R. Larson (CRL22) chad(at)eldocomp(dot)com
Eldorado Computing, Inc. 602-604-3100
5353 North 16th Street, Suite 400
Phoenix, Arizona 85016-3228
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Mark McEahern | 2002-06-20 21:37:18 | Re: time stamp |
| Previous Message | Felipe Nascimento | 2002-06-20 18:31:39 | Re: time stamp |