Re: Streaming replication and non-blocking I/O

From: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Streaming replication and non-blocking I/O
Date: 2010-01-13 08:47:48
Message-ID: 3f0b79eb1001130047r336a9b95y725187eaa5cd152d@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Thanks for your advice!

On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 3:37 AM, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
>> This change which moves walreceiver process into a dynamically loaded
>> module caused the following compile error on my MinGW environment.
>
> That sounds strange - it should pick those up from the -lpostgres. Any
> chance you have an old postgres binary around from a non-syncrep build
> or something?

No, there is no old postgres binary.

> Do you have an environment to try to build it under msvc?

No, unfortunately.

> in my
> experience, that gives you easier-to-understand error messages in a
> lot of cases like this - it removets the mingw black magic.

OK. I'll try to build it under msvc.

But since there seems to be a long way to go before doing that,
I would appreciate if someone could give me some advice.

Regards,

--
Fujii Masao
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Boszormenyi Zoltan 2010-01-13 09:14:12 Re: lock_timeout GUC patch
Previous Message Greg Smith 2010-01-13 08:47:33 Re: Streaming replication status