Re: Synch Rep for CommitFest 2009-07

From: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Synch Rep for CommitFest 2009-07
Date: 2009-07-15 16:45:03
Message-ID: 3f0b79eb0907150945r1d157d38y58c3fc53347f30d1@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 8:15 PM, Robert Haas<robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> So I think you should update ASAP in this case.

I updated the patch as described in
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2009-07/msg00865.php

All the other parts are still the same.

>  As soon as we get
> some reviewers freed up from the initial reviewing round, I will
> assign one or more reviewers to the main Sync Rep patch.

Thanks!

Regards,

--
Fujii Masao
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center

Attachment Content-Type Size
synch_rep_0716.tgz application/x-gzip 169.6 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Smith 2009-07-15 16:45:18 Re: Mysql.whynot or PG vs MySQL comparison table?
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2009-07-15 16:28:57 Re: [GENERAL] large object does not exist after pg_migrator