Re: jsonpath

From: Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Nikita Glukhov <n(dot)gluhov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Stas Kelvich <s(dot)kelvich(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Alexander Korotkov <a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Oleg Bartunov <obartunov(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: jsonpath
Date: 2018-11-08 01:57:46
Message-ID: 3d3d4876-3084-c339-ce0a-d8b7e96a38d3@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

BTW is the v19 really just a rebase of the preceding version?

I'm asking because v18 was adding two types into pg_type.dat, namely
jsonpath (6050) and _jsonpath (6051), while v19 only adds jsonpath
(6050). I've noticed because v18 was missing a comma between the two
entries, which I'd say is a bug - interestingly enough, both types were
created correctly, so it seems to be resilient to such typos.

regards

--
Tomas Vondra http://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2018-11-08 02:01:28 Re: ATTACH/DETACH PARTITION CONCURRENTLY
Previous Message Tomas Vondra 2018-11-08 01:52:09 Re: jsonpath