Re: jsonpath

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Nikita Glukhov <n(dot)gluhov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Stas Kelvich <s(dot)kelvich(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Alexander Korotkov <a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Oleg Bartunov <obartunov(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: jsonpath
Date: 2018-11-08 05:12:55
Message-ID: 30161.1541653975@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> BTW is the v19 really just a rebase of the preceding version?
> I'm asking because v18 was adding two types into pg_type.dat, namely
> jsonpath (6050) and _jsonpath (6051), while v19 only adds jsonpath
> (6050).

I haven't looked at this patch, but manual generation of array type entries
is obsolete since 3dc820c43e427371b66d217f2bd5481fc9ef2e2d. There should
still be a mention of the OID to use for the array type though ...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pavel Stehule 2018-11-08 05:13:30 Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Generic type subscripting
Previous Message Andrew Gierth 2018-11-08 05:04:35 Re: Adding a TAP test checking data consistency on standby with minRecoveryPoint