Re: pglz performance

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Andrey Borodin <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru>
Cc: Gasper Zejn <zejn(at)owca(dot)info>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pglz performance
Date: 2019-11-01 12:33:32
Message-ID: 3c2d92d0-e715-f9ed-e1a7-3c510ed65940@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2019-10-25 07:05, Andrey Borodin wrote:
>> 21 окт. 2019 г., в 14:09, Andrey Borodin <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru> написал(а):
>>
>> With Silesian corpus pglz_decompress_hacked is actually decreasing performance on high-entropy data.
>> Meanwhile pglz_decompress_hacked8 is still faster than usual pglz_decompress.
>> In spite of this benchmarks, I think that pglz_decompress_hacked8 is safer option.
>
> Here's v3 which takes into account recent benchmarks with Silesian Corpus and have better comments.

Your message from 21 October appears to say that this change makes the
performance worse. So I don't know how to proceed with this.

--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2019-11-01 12:41:46 Re: pause recovery if pitr target not reached
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2019-11-01 12:29:58 Re: [PATCH] Add some useful asserts into View Options macroses