Re: Performance issue with Pointcloud extension

From: Eric Lemoine <eric(dot)lemoine(at)oslandia(dot)com>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Performance issue with Pointcloud extension
Date: 2017-06-09 16:13:23
Message-ID: 3b3a311c-2854-f5a1-011c-388d5ee9574d@oslandia.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On 06/08/2017 10:41 PM, Éric wrote:
>
>
>
>> Have you experimented with other queries that don't involve PostGIS?
>> I'm wondering if your hook-installation code fails to work properly
>> unless PostGIS was loaded first. This would be easier to credit if
>> there are hooks both extensions try to get into.
>
>
> I think you're right on Tom. It looks like I cannot reproduce the issue if I start by calling a PostGIS function rather than a Pointcloud function. So it may well be a conflict between PostGIS and Pointcloud. Both use fn_extra, and that makes we wonder. This old thread [*] makes me wonder too! I still need to figure out the bug, but I can see some light now! thanks
>
> [*] <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/984D0F47C5FF4D0DB0D71A4F6EF670ED%40cleverelephant(dot)ca#984D0F47C5FF4D0DB0D71A4F6EF670ED(at)cleverelephant(dot)ca>

I now think that the performance bug is not related to the fn_extra
thing. I had hope but not anymore :) I don't see where the Pointcloud
and PostGIS extensions could conflict.

--
Éric Lemoine
Oslandia
+33 1 86 95 95 55

Attachment Content-Type Size
eric_lemoine.vcf text/x-vcard 209 bytes

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message armand pirvu 2017-06-09 16:13:51 Re: Vacuum and state_change
Previous Message Harry Ambrose 2017-06-09 16:02:50 Re: ERROR: unexpected chunk number 0 (expected 1) for toast value 76753264 in pg_toast_10920100