Re: Include schema-qualified names in publication error messages.

From: "Euler Taveira" <euler(at)eulerto(dot)com>
To: "Amit Kapila" <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, "shveta(dot)malik(at)gmail(dot)com" <shveta(dot)malik(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "vignesh C" <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Dilip Kumar" <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Peter Smith" <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>, "PostgreSQL Hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, "shveta malik" <shvetamalik(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Include schema-qualified names in publication error messages.
Date: 2026-05-07 12:19:46
Message-ID: 3a8cc8db-dd10-4835-bdea-a51e70402e18@app.fastmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, May 7, 2026, at 7:07 AM, Amit Kapila wrote:
>
> That makes sense. I have changed that in the attached and made slight
> modifications in the comments. How about attached?
>

One minor suggestion is to rename get_relation_qualified_name to
get_qualified_relation_name. If we want to reuse this new function
get_relation_qualified_name into other places, shouldn't we move this function
to lsyscache.c? There are places like matview.c that could benefit from this new
function.

--
Euler Taveira
EDB https://www.enterprisedb.com/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Euler Taveira 2026-05-07 12:27:09 Re: Include schema-qualified names in publication error messages.
Previous Message Andrey Borodin 2026-05-07 11:57:28 Re: [PATCH] Fix ProcKill lock-group vs procLatch recycle race