Re: statistics about tamp tables ...

From: Hans-Jürgen Schönig <hs(at)cybertec(dot)at>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: statistics about tamp tables ...
Date: 2003-11-29 07:58:00
Message-ID: 3FC85188.9070705@cybertec.at
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 26, 2003 at 05:34:28PM +0100, Hans-Jürgen Schönig wrote:
>
>
>>The reason why I came up with this posting is slightly different: Assume
>>a JDBC application which works with PostgreSQL + some other database. If
>>you want to use both databases without PostgreSQL being unnecessarily
>>slow an implicit mechanism would be better. Because otherwise you will
>>have an SQL command in there which is off standard - putting a switch
>>into the application seems to be a fairly ugly solution.
>
>
> That's why you delegate the job to something else, like pg_autovacuum or
> cron ...
>

If you are in the middle of a data mining application using a tmp table
you don't want to wait for cron ;). You might want the statistics to be
correct as soon as the table has been created.

Regards,
Hans

--
Cybertec Geschwinde u Schoenig
Ludo-Hartmannplatz 1/14, A-1160 Vienna, Austria
Tel: +43/2952/30706 or +43/664/233 90 75
www.cybertec.at, www.postgresql.at, kernel.cybertec.at

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2003-11-29 08:09:06 Re: cvs head configure broken for --with-krb5 on RH9
Previous Message Randolf Richardson 2003-11-29 06:15:51 Re: *sigh*