| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl> |
|---|---|
| To: | Hans-Jürgen Schönig <hs(at)cybertec(dot)at> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: statistics about tamp tables ... |
| Date: | 2003-11-28 21:43:11 |
| Message-ID: | 20031128214310.GB6394@dcc.uchile.cl |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Nov 26, 2003 at 05:34:28PM +0100, Hans-Jürgen Schönig wrote:
> The reason why I came up with this posting is slightly different: Assume
> a JDBC application which works with PostgreSQL + some other database. If
> you want to use both databases without PostgreSQL being unnecessarily
> slow an implicit mechanism would be better. Because otherwise you will
> have an SQL command in there which is off standard - putting a switch
> into the application seems to be a fairly ugly solution.
That's why you delegate the job to something else, like pg_autovacuum or
cron ...
--
Alvaro Herrera (<alvherre[a]dcc.uchile.cl>)
"En las profundidades de nuestro inconsciente hay una obsesiva necesidad
de un universo lógico y coherente. Pero el universo real se halla siempre
un paso más allá de la lógica" (Irulan)
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Gavin Sherry | 2003-11-28 21:47:31 | Re: Date bug in PG |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2003-11-28 21:09:13 | Re: Change in behaviour of ORDER BY clause in PG7.3 |