Re: cvs head? initdb?

From: Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com>
To: Christopher Browne <cbbrowne(at)libertyrms(dot)info>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: cvs head? initdb?
Date: 2003-11-14 00:11:44
Message-ID: 3FB41DC0.1060909@Yahoo.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Christopher Browne wrote:

> elein(at)varlena(dot)com (elein) writes:
>> What is the status of CVS head? Isn't it in sync with 7.4.RC2? I
>> just upgraded from CVS and rebuilt clean and initdb now gives this
>> lovely informative initdb failed message.
>
> No, I believe that they have started applying 7.5 patches, notably
> including reimplementing initdb in C.
>
> Jan checked in the ARC changes last night, and he and Tom ran into
> some problems, leading to that being pulled back out, while he
> revisits the code.

Yeah, there was a problem with *extreme* sharing ... the code tried to
use the same buffer for multiple disk blocks at the same time, and
somehow the backends did not agree on the correct content. But it's
fixed and back in. You can see ARC working by setting

buffer_strategy_status_interval = 10 # seconds

and starting postmaster with -d1

Jan

--
#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me. #
#================================================== JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com #

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2003-11-14 00:16:53 Re: Background writer process
Previous Message Tom Lane 2003-11-14 00:00:22 Re: cvs head? initdb?