Re: postgresql.conf

From: Ron <rstpierre(at)syscor(dot)com>
To: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: postgresql.conf
Date: 2003-07-30 18:59:42
Message-ID: 3F28159E.6090606@syscor.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Josh Berkus wrote:

>Robert,
>
>
>
>>Are you planning on differentiating between dedicated machines and
>>
>>
>multi-server
>
>
>>machines? For example, a dedicated database for a webserver would be tuned
>>differently from a server that was running both the webserver and the
>>
>>
>database on
>
>
>>the same machine.
>>
>>
>
>My thought is when we define "Small Machine" in at the top of the file we
>define it as "Small Machine or Multi-Purpose machine". The settings should
>be nearly the same for a machine that has only 64MB of *available* RAM as one
>that has only 96MB of RAM at all.
>
>
>
We are using postgres 7.3.2 for one of our clients with a smallish db,
on a p4 with 4G ram box which also servers as a web server and a
web-based file repository (~ 80G). We are starting another project for
another customer, on a p4 with 2G ram, and the db will be larger, approx
7-15G when finished. This box will also be used as a web server, and as
it won't go 'live' until the fall, will run 7.4.

I don't know if this is representative of other postgresql installs, but
I would also put in my vote for the differentiation added, as these are
not small machines but are multi-server boxes.

my 2 cents worth
Ron

PS the new postgresql.conf performance tuning docs are extremely
helpful, thanks

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2003-07-30 19:10:49 Re: postgresql.conf
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2003-07-30 18:43:11 Re: postgresql.conf