Re: postgresql.conf

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: Ron <rstpierre(at)syscor(dot)com>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: postgresql.conf
Date: 2003-07-30 19:10:49
Message-ID: 200307301210.49034.josh@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Ron,

> I don't know if this is representative of other postgresql installs, but
> I would also put in my vote for the differentiation added, as these are
> not small machines but are multi-server boxes.

But how is the Multi-purpose configuration different from the Small Machine
configuration? If the actual settings are the same, we just need to
explain somewhere what it means.

I'll argue pretty strongly against including a seperate MP configuration
because it would raise our number of suggested sets to 10 from 7.

--
-Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Rajesh Kumar Mallah 2003-07-30 19:38:31 Re: Why performance improvement on converting subselect
Previous Message Ron 2003-07-30 18:59:42 Re: postgresql.conf