Re: Feature freeze and the great elog changeover

From: Paul Ramsey <pramsey(at)refractions(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Feature freeze and the great elog changeover
Date: 2003-06-25 21:13:44
Message-ID: 3EFA1088.70306@refractions.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Lots of hardcoded english... is i8n something which gets raised often,
or is it lingue franca enough that people don't care? (Since all the
messages are going to be looked at anyways...)

Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
>
>>>I think at least one person had volunteered to help with the editing;
>>>that might be a good thing if they're still willing. There's something
>>>upwards of 4000 elog calls to be looked at :-(
>
>
>>Do we get error numbers with that? :-)
>
>
> That is the point ... I'd not really be bothering otherwise ...

--
__
/
| Paul Ramsey
| Refractions Research
| Email: pramsey(at)refractions(dot)net
| Phone: (250) 885-0632
\_

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Reuven M. Lerner 2003-06-25 21:13:49 Re: Many Pl/PgSQL parameters -> AllocSetAlloc(128)?
Previous Message Matthew T. O'Connor 2003-06-25 20:54:23 Re: Updating psql for features of new FE/BE protocol