Re: pg_dump / pg_dumpall / memory issues

From: Dennis Gearon <gearond(at)cvc(dot)net>
To: Doug McNaught <doug(at)mcnaught(dot)org>
Cc: Kyle <kyle(at)ccidomain(dot)com>, Forum - Postgresql General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_dump / pg_dumpall / memory issues
Date: 2003-04-10 17:08:20
Message-ID: 3E95A504.9020404@cvc.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

If it does, then the first PC based multimedia system will fially be born.
Actually, the reverse of nice is needed for that; I need X amount of mips and Y
amount of I/O to run, should be a valid API call. THEN, multimedia apps can be
waht they're supposed to be.

Doug McNaught wrote:
> Kyle <kyle(at)ccidomain(dot)com> writes:
>
>
>>Shridhar has a good point using nice. I know RedHat supports nice
>>because I have installed a totally background program that uses "nice
>>19" as part of its command line.
>
>
> He's talking about honoring 'nice' for I/O scheduling, which is
> in addition to the standard modification of CPU priority. Linux
> doesn't currently do this in 2.4--it was discussed for 2.5 but I don't
> know if it has gone in yet.
>
> -Doug
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dennis Gearon 2003-04-10 17:17:40 Re: some good news
Previous Message Tony Grant 2003-04-10 16:57:30 some good news