| From: | Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Manfred Koizar <mkoi-pg(at)aon(dot)at>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Nested transactions: low level stuff |
| Date: | 2003-03-20 04:02:57 |
| Message-ID: | 3E793D71.949D597D@tpf.co.jp |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> Hiroshi Inoue wrote:
> > > > Vadim planned to implement the savepoints functionality
> > > > using UNDO mechanism. AFAIR it was never denied explicitly.
> > >
> > > If you go to the TODO.detail/transactions archive, there was discussion
> > > of using UNDO, and most felt that there were too many problems of having
> > > to manage the undo system,
> >
> > This is closely related to the basics of PostgreSQL.
> > Pleas don't decide it implicitly.
>
> We took a vote and UNDO lost --- do you want to do another vote?
Sorry I missed the vote. Where is it ?
regards,
Hiroshi Inoue
http://www.geocities.jp/inocchichichi/psqlodbc/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Neil Conway | 2003-03-20 04:10:18 | Re: A bad behavior under autocommit off mode |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-03-20 03:55:45 | Re: A bad behavior under autocommit off mode |