Re: A bad behavior under autocommit off mode

From: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>
To: Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: A bad behavior under autocommit off mode
Date: 2003-03-20 04:10:18
Message-ID: 1048133418.19802.627.camel@tokyo
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, 2003-03-19 at 18:55, Hiroshi Inoue wrote:
> Does the change worth the trouble ?
> Please don't break BACKWARD COMPATIBILITY easily.

If it's important enough, we can provide a GUC option for it.

My guess is that a GUC option isn't needed, but then again we've been
criticized for disregarding backward compatibility in the past...

Cheers,

Neil

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2003-03-20 04:14:01 Re: A bad behavior under autocommit off mode
Previous Message Hiroshi Inoue 2003-03-20 04:02:57 Re: Nested transactions: low level stuff