Re: new Configuration patch, implements 'include'

From: mlw <pgsql(at)mohawksoft(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-patches-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: new Configuration patch, implements 'include'
Date: 2003-02-17 20:14:02
Message-ID: 3E51428A.8000500@mohawksoft.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian wrote:

>mlw wrote:
>
>
>>I don't like the idea of specifying a directory, per se' because if you
>>have multiple database installations, how would you share the
>>configuration without symlinks?
>>
>>
>
>Oh, for example, you would be sharing postgresql.conf, perhaps, but not
>pg_hba.conf.
>
>
Actually, the other way around.

An "official" pg_hba.conf and pg_ident.conf setup by an admin, but
differing postgresql.conf files for different databases. Does that make
sense?

>
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message mlw 2003-02-17 20:25:47 Yet another configuration patch with include, and configuration dir
Previous Message Sailesh Krishnamurthy 2003-02-17 19:48:43 Re: Detecting corrupted pages earlier