Re: new Configuration patch, implements 'include'

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: mlw <pgsql(at)mohawksoft(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-patches-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: new Configuration patch, implements 'include'
Date: 2003-02-17 19:31:07
Message-ID: 200302171931.h1HJV7x19098@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

mlw wrote:
> I don't like the idea of specifying a directory, per se' because if you
> have multiple database installations, how would you share the
> configuration without symlinks?

Oh, for example, you would be sharing postgresql.conf, perhaps, but not
pg_hba.conf.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2003-02-17 19:41:03 Detecting corrupted pages earlier
Previous Message Kevin Brown 2003-02-17 19:27:35 Re: Questions about indexes?