| From: | Carlos Correia <carlos(at)m16e(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Fernando Nasser <fnasser(at)redhat(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Dave Cramer <Dave(at)micro-automation(dot)net>, "pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Strange behaviour of JDBC driver for PostgreSQL |
| Date: | 2002-12-18 17:55:29 |
| Message-ID: | 3E00B691.10401@m16e.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-jdbc |
Fernando,
i am sure the db is version 7.2.2
Thanks anyway,
Carlos
Fernando Nasser wrote:
> Carlos Correia wrote:
>
>>
>> Dave Cramer wrote:
>>
>>> Carlos,
>>>
>>> Is this a new message today, or one from yesterday?
>>>
>>>
>> Dave,
>>
>> It is the same messge, but as I think that everyone is
>> misunderstooding the problem, I'll try to resume it:
>>
>> 1. I don't know why the driver reports version 6.5.2, as I don't have
>> such a version.
>
>
> The JDBC driver receives the version from the database backend when
> connecting and that is what is printed by the
> getDatabaseProductVersion() function. There is no way it can generate
> a 6.x.x version number by itself.
>
> You _must_ be connecting to a 6.5.2 backend.
>
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Anders Hermansen | 2002-12-18 19:33:02 | Re: (forw) [bfl@florianbruckner.com: AW: Reversedb tool and getPrimaryKeys] |
| Previous Message | Fernando Nasser | 2002-12-18 16:28:51 | Re: Strange behaviour of JDBC driver for PostgreSQL |