| From: | "Shridhar Daithankar" <shridhar_daithankar(at)persistent(dot)co(dot)in> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: transactions |
| Date: | 2002-10-21 13:52:47 |
| Message-ID: | 3DB45407.22160.AC7AED2@localhost |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On 17 Oct 2002 at 11:47, Harald Fuchs wrote:
> In article <200210161647(dot)g9GGl4t08435(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>,
> pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us (Bruce Momjian) writes:
>
> >> To be fair, in the Oracle posting, they actually said PostgreSQL
> >> lacked the "transactional features" of "any commercial enterprise
> >> database". While that is presumably something beyond just
> >> "transactions", I was completely unclear about what it was supposed
> >> actually to be. Anyone got any ideas?
>
> > They were confusing us with MySQL. It was a marketing guy.
>
> ... who didn't know that MySQL _does_ support transactions :-)
So innodb is default now?
Bye
Shridhar
--
Male, n.: A member of the unconsidered, or negligible sex. The male of the
human race is commonly known to the female as Mere Man. The genus has two
varieties: good providers and bad providers. -- Ambrose Bierce, "The Devil's
Dictionary"
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Patrick Fiche | 2002-10-21 13:53:50 | Re: select into without creating new table |
| Previous Message | Shridhar Daithankar | 2002-10-21 13:51:44 | Re: Inquiry From Form [pgsql] |