Re: transactions

From: "Gregory Wood" <gregw(at)com-stock(dot)com>
To: "PostgreSQL-General" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: transactions
Date: 2002-10-21 15:41:44
Message-ID: 01e801c27918$5d4a94a0$7889ffcc@comstock.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

> > > They were confusing us with MySQL. It was a marketing guy.
> >
> > ... who didn't know that MySQL _does_ support transactions :-)
>
> So innodb is default now?

Not when I built 3.23.52 a month or two ago. It wasn't even included in
installation. I'm tempted to add it, but I don't know if my eventual hosting
environment will include it, so I'm hesitant to do so.

Greg

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2002-10-21 15:46:02 Re: isAutoIncrement and Postgres
Previous Message Stephan Szabo 2002-10-21 15:25:22 Re: Working with foreign key constraints