Re: PGXLOG variable worthwhile?

From: Justin Clift <justin(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: Mike Mascari <mascarm(at)mascari(dot)com>
Cc: Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Hackers Mailing List <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PGXLOG variable worthwhile?
Date: 2002-09-12 12:11:16
Message-ID: 3D808464.9E6C7376@postgresql.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Mike Mascari wrote:
<snip>
> In Windows 2000 and Windows XP with an NTFS filesystem,
> Microsoft has added Reparse Points, which allow for the
> implementation of symbolic links for directories. Microsoft
> calls them "Junctions". I *believe* the function used for
> creating reparse points is DeviceIoControl() with the
> FSCTL_SET_REPARSE_POINT I/O control code. I don't have quick
> access to 2K or XP, but it is clearly not supported by Win32 on
> 95/98/ME.
>
> Here's a link discussing the features of NTFS5 and Reparse Points:
>
> http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/dnw2kmag00/html/NTFSPart1.asp

That's really useful info. Reparse points under Win2k (mount points to
the rest of us) are definitely something to try out in the future then.
:)

Seems like the NT4 users are left out in the cold though until we add
some kind of ability for PostgreSQL to not look at the filesystem for
info about where to put the xlog files.

Regards and best wishes,

Justin Clift


> Mike Mascari
> mascarm(at)mascari(dot)com

--
"My grandfather once told me that there are two kinds of people: those
who work and those who take the credit. He told me to try to be in the
first group; there was less competition there."
- Indira Gandhi

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Zbigniew Lukasiak 2002-09-12 12:51:25 UTF-8 collation (was Re: [BUGS] LATIN2 ORDER BY)
Previous Message Oliver Elphick 2002-09-12 11:35:17 Re: pg_dump problems in upgrading