Re: pg_dump problems in upgrading

From: Oliver Elphick <olly(at)lfix(dot)co(dot)uk>
To: Philip Warner <pjw(at)rhyme(dot)com(dot)au>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pg_dump problems in upgrading
Date: 2002-09-12 11:35:17
Message-ID: 1031830517.18150.3.camel@linda
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, 2002-09-12 at 00:52, Philip Warner wrote:
> At 12:31 PM 9/09/2002 +0100, Oliver Elphick wrote:
> >3. A view is being created before one of the tables it refers to.
> >Should not views be created only at the very end?
>
> This would be trivial (and we already put several items at the end), but I
> am not sure it would fix the problem since views can also be on other
> views. I presume the bad ordering happened as a result of a drop/create on
> a table? Or is there some other cause?

It could be, but I don't know for sure. This is a development db which
quite often gets reloaded entirely and repopulated.

--
Oliver Elphick Oliver(dot)Elphick(at)lfix(dot)co(dot)uk
Isle of Wight, UK
http://www.lfix.co.uk/oliver
GPG: 1024D/3E1D0C1C: CA12 09E0 E8D5 8870 5839 932A 614D 4C34 3E1D 0C1C
========================================
"Let the wicked forsake his way, and the unrighteous
man his thoughts; and let him return unto the LORD,
and He will have mercy upon him; and to our God, for
he will abundantly pardon." Isaiah 55:7

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Justin Clift 2002-09-12 12:11:16 Re: PGXLOG variable worthwhile?
Previous Message Mike Mascari 2002-09-12 09:34:11 Re: PGXLOG variable worthwhile?