Re: PostGres Doubt

From: David Ford <david+cert(at)blue-labs(dot)org>
To: Dann Corbit <DCorbit(at)connx(dot)com>
Cc: vikas p verma <vvicky72(at)rediffmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PostGres Doubt
Date: 2002-06-12 16:21:48
Message-ID: 3D07751C.4020602@blue-labs.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

I.e. "md5" in pg_hba.conf? This is rather disappointing.

Here are a few references:

http://lists.initd.org/pipermail/psycopg/2002-January/000673.html
http://lists.initd.org/pipermail/psycopg/2002-January/000674.html
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-bugs/2002-03/msg00048.php

And finally..
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-bugs/2002-01/msg00153.php

So reentrancy in libpq basically is put on hold until 7.3.

David

Dann Corbit wrote:

>Are you using crypt on the connection?
>
>Unfortunately, crypt is not reentrant.
>
>
>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: David Ford [mailto:david+cert(at)blue-labs(dot)org]
>>Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 6:16 PM
>>To: Dann Corbit
>>Cc: vikas p verma; pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
>>Subject: Re: [HACKERS] PostGres Doubt
>>
>>
>>Is libpq/PQconnectdb() reentrant? I've tried repeatedly over
>>time and
>>it seems to incur segfaults every single time.
>>
>>-d
>>
>>Dann Corbit wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>The libpq functions are reentrant. These will be useful for
>>>
>>>
>>just about
>>
>>
>>>any project.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2002-06-12 16:40:29 Re: [BUGS] Bug #640: ECPG: inserting float numbers
Previous Message Tom Lane 2002-06-12 16:12:50 Shouldn't "aborted transaction" be an ERROR? (was Re: [NOVICE] Optimising inside transactions)